Language design in the 1960’s was dominated by attempts to improve upon Algol60. Hoare noted in 1973  that ALGOL-60 was “… a language so far ahead of its time, that it was not only an improvement on its predecessors, but also on nearly all its successors”. Niklaus Wirth was a graduate student at University of California, Berkeley when he started playing around with languages. He joined a research group which was engaged with the implementation and improvement of a dialect of ALGOL-58, NELIAC. He described the compiler as “an intricate mess“, and the process one of “1% science, and 99% sorcery” .
The first language Wirth designed leading to his dissertation was Euler, as Wirth himself put it “a trip with the bush knife through the jungle of language features and facilities” . Euler had academic elegance, but no real practical value, however it did catch the attention of the IFIP Working Group, engaged in designing the successor to ALGOL-60. There seemed to be two camps here, one which wanted to push the boundaries of language design and another which wanted to extend ALGOL-60. Wirth belonged to the latter group. In 1965, three reports by Wirth, Seegmüller, and Wijngaarden described three different quasi-complete languages. The complexity of the design process, involving far too many people, eventually led Wirth to become disheartened with the design process, and he went off to develop his own version of ALGOL-60s successor. Designed with contributions from Tony Hoare, this language would become ALGOL-W.
Wirth’s first significant language was PL360, a byproduct of the ALGOL-W effort. The IBM 360 upon which ALGOL-W was implemented offered the choice of assembly language or Fortran compilers, neither of which was very attractive. PL360  was a tool with which to implement ALGOL-W. ALGOL-W had a number of applications, but was deficient as a systems programming language. PL360 was to become more successful than ALGOL-W, largely because ALGOL-W was a complex language, and the target computers inadequate. In the fall of 1967, Wirth returned to Switzerland to begin work on the language that would become most closely associated with his language design efforts – Pascal. Wirth would go on to create a trinity of languages, neither of which were that closely related, but all that had one thing in common, they were “ALGOL-like” languages – Pascal, Modula-2 and Oberon.
- Pascal – Based largely on Algol W, including the use of it’s while and case statements, and record structures. There were syntactic differences, however Algol 60 was almost a subset of Pascal.
- Modula-2 – Wirth noted that Modula-2 “includes all aspects of Pascal, and extends them with the module concept”.
- Oberon – Evolved from Modula-2 by very few additions, and several subtractions.
Note that “ALGOL-like” really implied – a procedural paradigm, a rigorously defined syntax, traditional mathematical notation (with the nonsense of symbols like ++), block structure providing identifier scope, the availability of recursion, and a strict, static data typing system. 
 Wirth, N., “From programming language design to computer construction”, CACM, 28(2), pp. 160-164 (1985)
 Wirth, N., “PL360, a programming language for the 360 computers”, Journal of the ACM, 15(1), pp.34-74 (1968)
 Wirth, N., “Modula-2 and Oberon”, in ACM Conf. on History of Programming Languages, pp.3-1-3-10 (2007)